My contract ended on September 30, and
my son, James, was born on the 10th of November. My first son is six years old. This is my second child, and my second unpaid maternity leave. It is also the first leave where there is no contract afterwards. I am not complaining. I can afford to take time off and be with my children. This is simply a post that summarizes my experience, while trying not to impose judgement.
Dreams and science
I have been working in science for the past 15 years, and felt on the top of the world since. I started research in 2001, two months before the September 11 disaster.
My first research project was in grid computing, and our dream was that "the grid", which was made up of remote computers connected through the internet, would be accessible to everyone. In the years that passed, the grid became the cloud, and the dream was achieved.
My second research project from that period involved modelling gravitational wave emission from boson stars (compact objects that can mimic black holes and are made up of dark matter-like particles) numerically. The dream there was that gravitational waves would be found, and that models like the one we made up could be constrained. LIGO found its first waves in 2015, and work on constraining various models with real data is underway. So, from a scientific perspective, I am in the unique position of saying that some of what I dreamed of happened. Of course, there were other projects I started later, which still have to reach this dream-like outcome, e.g., we still don't know what dark matter is, and if it is made-up of
luke-warm ultralight particles or not, and we don't know much more about neutron stars than we did when I started my PhD thesis. We also don't wear atomic clocks on our wrists and while we have them in space,
they don't yet go around in trucks and planes to monitor density changes underground.
The academic environment
In all this time, the academic environment has been surprisingly static. Proposals are written the same way, and the process is even more complicated and time consuming than in the past with fewer positive outcomes. Grants do not, generally, come with money for maternity or paternity leave even in countries where these kind of leaves are the norm. In Europe, countries provide for their own citizens, but most scientists
work in countries that are not their own and cannot take advantage of these programs.
There are some very few specific awards on which there is support, but, on average, postdoc and PhD advisors are still in the position where they have no money to provide their staff with if they get pregnant. They also do not know how to handle these situations because there are so few women and no rules and no help. If they are stuck in the position of having a pregnant employee under a contract that cannot be broken, a good advisor mostly allows the person to show up and do what they can when they are able to once they have their baby. If the contract is temporary, the contract is often not extended or renewed. If the position is tenure-track, then there are provisions. The tenure clock can be stopped for a period, and they teach less or not at all for some time after having a baby. It helps to be in a university with money and staff to spare. When I was at Cornell, we had a woman faculty who received tenure and had twins the same year. However, not everyone can have children so late, and not everyone who wants a tenure track-job gets one. In fact, most do not. So, postponing having children until one has tenure or is tenure-track, can mean choosing to have neither family nor career. The late twenties and early to mid thirties are a natural time for women to have children, and a safety net is simply not there when we need it, but a weak net appears later for the very few who manage to achieve the tenure/tenure-track position.
Paternity leave? In Switzerland, they have passed a law that allows for two weeks of paternity leave -- starting perhaps in the summer of 2020. In the UK, paternity leave is up to two weeks, to be taken in one week chunks paid somewhere at 140 pounds/week or 90% of the weekly salary, whichever is lower. While there are individual institutions with better policies, most of my colleagues who had children also had a wife who stayed home to be with those children. A good fraction of them married colleagues who had a very similar education to their own. When somebody has to compromise it's often the woman because she is less likely to get that tenure-track job in the first place and also we do breastfeed.
There are a few exceptions. I can think of several women who had supportive environments and were able to keep their jobs. All of them are still employed today, and still at the top of their respective fields.
Discussion with Human Resources
I did email human resources, although belatedly. They said I would have been eligible for maternity leave if my son had be born on time because it would have been within 6 weeks of the end of the contract. My son's due date was November 2, but he was born on November 10. My contract ended on September 30. However, as he was born just beyond the six week period (depending how one counts), there is nothing they can do. They did say that if I had discussed with them in the beginning of the pregnancy, they would have tried to come with a round-about solution BUT that departments are not required to report the pregnancy of the their employees to Human Resources. SO, basically, nobody knows when a PhD or postdoc has a baby. I was the second woman in our group to have a child. The other woman was a visitor from Pakistan who had a one year visiting position. She showed up 7 month pregnant, without mentioning the pregnancy on the application (it was openly admitted that had she mentioned it, she would not have had the one year position). Her pregnancy was not reported to HR. She was tacitly allowed to skip work and I actively encouraged her to do so because she had a high risk pregnancy where her previous baby died a few days after birth. No extension was granted. She did ask both the grant office and our advisor, but they said there were no rules in place for such situations and they did not create rules for her. She finished her technical article in collaboration with UZH, after she returned to Pakistan, on her own time -- unpaid by the Swiss.
I was then advised to ask the Swiss SNF if they could help. The head of the Equality Office at SNF personally answered my email and said that she had to quit science when she had her two children, which is how she joined the SNF, and that there was no extension that I qualified for. I also spoke with the leader of "Fix the leaking pipeline" project - but they have no funds to help. This project is a multi-million francs award given to address the leaky pipeline issue. They have a number of work-packages and work with the university/ETH when they hire faculty to make sure some women are considered. They did say that employees on temporary contracts (postdocs and graduate students) are vulnerable and have trouble when needing maternity leave/sick leave especially when they are immigrants, but beyond referring them to HR there is little they can do. Most scientists in Switzerland are immigrants.
Eventually, the HR ladies became a bit aggressive (after taking to my advisor who must have become defensive because I was attempting to push this further when he had specifically mentioned there was no money on his grant to help me) and I felt a villain in their eyes -- a villain or a person who is trying to disturb established order. They said I traveled at the end of my pregnancy and that I was paid while I traveled. I did travel in August to the US where I gave a number of seminars (one at Cornell, one at Penn State and one at NCSA), and some of the local expenses were supported by the host universities, but my advisor had to pay over 3000 CHF. I also spent a week with my long-term collaborator, Prof. Jayashree Balakrishna making some progress on a project we were working on. It was the only trip I took over the ocean in the 5 years I was there, and we had discussed in the past that I could do one such trip. It is not unusual for scientists to travel. My advisor had always been very supportive. Throughout our 5 year collaboration, the only thing I wished he did not do was that when he was invited to give seminars about our joined work he refused invitations because he did not feel qualified, and did not suggest I go instead. Although, perhaps it was the right thing to do as we were neither geologists nor clock specialists, I would have liked to go and connect with both communities. I am, however, not sure such connections would have been possible and would have resulted in joint projects, but I never close doors even if it means potential humiliation due to lack of knowledge.
Basically, since James was born at the end of week 6, perhaps I could have had some leave if the staff had been willing to help. But they were not. It was easier to turn me into a sort of villain for giving some seminars and for asking for their help belatedly than to try to help. There was also another technical issue, which they did not mention, besides my advisor not having the money for this. Hiring a person beyond 5 years makes them permanent at Swiss universities. I had been there for five years. So, to give me leave, they might have had to hire me as permanent person during the leave and fire me.
Why did I ask late? I asked them late because I did not trust them and I was afraid they would be emotionally abusive. While one could hope they would not have been emotionally abusive had I communicated my pregnancy when it started, miscarriage is most common in the beginning of the pregnancy. I had this discussion with HR a bit after giving birth to a healthy child, and a few months before travelling back to be at the defence of the one PhD student I was co-advising. There is a risk of postpartum depression then, but unless the depression is severe it's not a life and death situation.
I am not the only one to feel this way. Other than my Pakistani colleague, who was on a temporary contract, which was not extended, UZH hired a woman faculty while I was there. She showed up 8 months pregnant. This was a surprise to everyone, which meant she did not feel safe enough to mention the pregnancy to the other staff or faculty before she arrived. Of course, she was in a different situation from me. Her contract is permanent. But she still felt unsafe. Back in graduate school, I remember a panel of successful scientists on how to succeed in industry or academia. One of them told us how he ruined his chances of getting a job when he excitedly mentioned he and his wife were expecting. Another time I was a postdoc and already visibly pregnant and I asked a question to a similar panel. They looked a me, and told me they know of nobody who had a child as a postdoc and succeed to obtain a tenure-track position. Basically, because of my unborn child, I had no chance to succeed.
The most useful advice I received regarding motherhood was from Ritchie Patterson -- a professor of applied physics at Cornell. She advised to not postpone having a family if we wanted one because life always arranges around it. She told us that she was lucky to be able to have her two children in her 40s, but many of her friends who chose to wait had medical problems that could not be solved and that often the biological clock stops working well before a woman reaches 40.
The reaction at work
I did not mention my pregnancy until it was obvious. So, everyone at the University of Zurich noticed I was pregnant only after I came back from the US in the beginning of September. This was during the LISA meeting. My colleagues congratulated me, and asked how far along I was.
I had an informal discussion during coffee with Karsten Danzmann from the AEI Hannover over a potential position. He also asked me when the due date was and congratulated me over the pregnancy. He jokingly asked if I am one of those crazy people who are back at work a day or two after having the baby. I smiled and stared blankly. He then patted my back and said I should, of course, take as much time off as I needed. My AEI visit was scheduled for late September. He proceeded to explain why it makes sense that I come visit AEI in person even though neither him nor the other group leader would be there at that time - I would be meeting the rest of the group and their opinion was decisive as well. By then I was more than 34 weeks along, and insurance does not cover travel beyond the 34th week. I booked my ticket and tried to come. I am tall and my pregnancy did not show very much, and so I thought the airline might not notice how far along I was. However, Wizz Air refused boarding. I wonder if, in their opinion, it is better to drive or take the train. I did contemplate these options between the moment I was denied boarding, and the moment I canceled the trip. Even though I lost the money for the tickets, it was easier this way. Edward had started school and refused to do homework with anyone but me. It would have been unreasonable to leave him alone and angry yet again. While Karsten wrote me a week after our coffee-break chat that I did not fit in his group, the AEI is still keen in having me visit, and believe I am more suited for an independent grant (i.e., they
would give me a desk and a support letter if I brought my own money)
than for a regular postdoctoral position.
|
Fancy, lovely dinner |
My postdoc advisor, Philippe Jetzer, honestly said he would not have been able to provide leave if I had been under contract because neither my fellowship nor his grant come with such money. Luckily, my contract was over before I gave birth. The sad part is that he is correct. There is no money for maternity leave on most science grants even in Switzerland. Like in the US, there are one or two very specific awards that come with maternity leave, but the majority of grants do not come with such provisions. I would like to stress that Philippe and our group at the UZH are outstandingly nice people as is Karsten and his group at the AEI. This is simply a statement of the general situation. Furthermore, the day care facility on the UZH campus is so small, it is not available unless one registers on their waiting list soon after getting pregnant or even before that. It is, however, quite prominent on campus and with a beautiful see-through glass window through which one can see the handful of children they care for.
Before I left, my group took me to dinner, and we had a wonderful time. I am still affiliated with the UZH for any research I do for the next 2 or 3 years. This means I can access computers, journals, the library, publish. I can also use the software, etc. While it involves working for free, all this is tremendously helpful. I also have computer accounts at NCSA, which come with a similar kind of affiliation. The AEI in Hannover still say they would be happy to have me visit, which I cannot do easily with a 7 day old baby, but there is always next year with its spring and summer.
Why I will NOT be applying for grants aimed at parents returning to science
I looked at these type of applications with my brother when he was considering re-entering the academic world. We were looking at the Marie Curie action with its CAR program, and we were told that the probability of getting funded in STEM in such a program is less than through a regular program. Basically, like with the UZH day care, they make such programs visible, but there is no money for them and the chances of getting funded are so low that it is not worth the time to write the 15+ pages of application. To restrict the applicant pool, they add conditions that enforce no work is published for the period of the leave, which is not something that would fit me. Mihai did apply that year and did not get funded, but I am not up to another such involved application with a baby and two other children to raise. My time is too valuable to write grant applications of tens of pages that have a probability of success of a few percent.
So what next?
Science-wise, I would like to finish the projects I started, and perhaps work one or two more things. It would be nice to be paid for some of this, but I do not wish to be at work from morning till night again while James is small, and Edward and David still need me so much. Even if day care was available, I do not want James to be away from me for most of the hours of the day.
Edward is in second grade even though he is only 6, and David is in 5th
grade at 9. They have lots of homework, and catching up to do, which I
have to help with. With Edward, I add multiple digits numbers, solve equations, and next semester we'll learn to multiply. With David, we do powers, systems of equations, and series of thousands of terms. This is the math, but there are also the other subjects that are mostly in a poorly translated German that have to be made sense of + Romanian with its grammar, poets, and writers.
I have a chicken army: we adopted 15 chickens from the factory farm in October under the assumption that half of them will die. So far they are all thriving. They now have feathers and spend most of their time outside. They come and eat from Edward's hand and we get about 2 eggs a day (total). We also have tortoises, 3 more chickens, terrapins, and a dog. The dog eats eggs, and so we have to make sure we get them before he does.
There is also other property to manage and lots of people to help and other things to do.
Why do I try to do so many things? Most pressure is self-imposed. I have always felt I have to prove that I am worthwhile and that I am leaving something behind. That something takes the form of an article, a book, a house, a happier child, a happier chicken, a new child, etc. It partly also comes from never receiving unconditional support from anyone other than my mother (and my grandmother when she was alive) and at times my brother. For the rest of the world, I keep having to prove that I have non-zero value and I am so tired of these endless proofs.
I try to invest some fraction of what I earn in what I think would
grow and/or last. I have done this since I started working. It helped to be living in the
privileged side of the world while keeping a relatively simple
life-style. I have used cars (old enough to drive themselves; 18+ years old) with small engines, and never had a taste for
eating out, alcohol, cigars or fancy clothes. I do travel. I started taking vacations after having children because they need to see the world to understand it, and because we enjoy it. We will continue to travel some of the time.
Am I damming the Swiss? How did it compare to the US? to England? (note: I added the text below two years after writing the rest of the post) Switzerland is an amazing country with amazing people and talented researchers. I had a large salary for 5 years and, while they did not provide maternity leave, they gave me my pension money back. This is why I can afford to be with my children today. My postdoc advisor was
always kind and supportive. It's just that he cannot provide support out of something that is simply not there.
In Switzerland, they do hate immigrants and enforce the temporary contracts to make sure people don't try to stay there. I received an L-permit, which is the worst/lowest kind, even though I was employed for 5 years, and should have received a B-permit, but that could have led to potential settlement. This is common throughout Europe -- England has a similar number of immigrants to Switzerland and they think like-wise. I could not rent an apartment in Zurich unless the building was demolished/entirely renovated after I left. I felt this hate at the bank -- especially when I showed up with my young son, and everywhere else I went -- including when contacting HR or dealing with the school system with my children. If the situation is borderline as with the six weeks period after the end of the contract with my son, they will err in the direction of not helping and they do so aggressively to make one become the villain for daring to ask for help. I remember going to the dentist and having the dentist confess that he was German -- as if it meant he was a kind of pariah -- he also said he was practicing in the suburbs because of this and made a lot less money because he was not Swiss. Of course, being German, French or Italian is a few steps better than being Eastern European. Being Asian or Black is worse even when one is Oprah Winfrey. The other thing about the Swiss is that they will never admit making mistakes or to being racist/sexist even to
Oprah Winfrey. In spite of all this, every once in awhile when knocking on enough doors, one meets a person who goes above and beyond their job to help and makes everything seem alright again.
In the US, they are less "transparent" as my postdoc advisor used to say, and less emotionally abusive as a consequence. One has the feeling that they do everything they can. When I was pregnant with my first child, I received the maximum amount of maternity leave, which I believe was five weeks of unpaid leave, but they also increased my salary so that, overall, I was paid more and not less and they made sure I knew I could bring my child to work and that he was welcome there. My postdoc advisor met with HR and made sure everything that could be done was done. Even though the situation with day care was the same (one had to register almost a year in advance and it was basically unavailable to people with temporary positions), the system felt less emotionally abusive. This is partly because many of the scientists who made it to professor positions are either sons or daughters of immigrants or immigrants themselves and the whole system is newer and more open to change.
The UK feels similar to Switzerland. I've spoken with a number of people at Portsmouth and it seems that every young scientist who is not alone, has a wife with similar education (often a degree in the same field from the same university) who is either staying home with the children or looking for a job in a trapped spouse situation when childless. The ICG in Portsmouth has the Athena Swan Bronze award. Just like UZH, they actively try to enforce equality. At the last big meeting in Gravitation, which was at Portsmouth, they had a large number of female speakers. When the conduct job searches, they actively try to hire women or at least have women on their short-lists. Yet one of their two women faculty left the university. She and her husband sold their house and moved to the US and
all other faculty had to sign they will not malign her reputation any more. I am not a faculty there, but it was sad that this had to happen to such a talented couple, who, eventually, reinvented themselves in the US and became a success there as well because of their amazing talent. The fact remains that she left her tenured job for a lesser one in the US and her husband became only a postdoc and lost his UK grant. They recovered, but they had to leave in the first place. The other person at ICG about which the same fake rumours were heard was promoted to a high leadership position within the university. He was, of course, male. The ICG did hire another woman on a tenure-track position (and several men), which allowed them to maintain the Bronze award, but not yet upgrade to Silver. The number of women faculty remained constant and the number of young people in the department grew, which always makes it more productive.